Hitting all maximum stable sets in P5-free graphs
Abstract
We prove that every P5-free graph of bounded clique number contains a small hitting set of all its maximum stable sets. More generally, let us say a class C of graphs is η-bounded if there exists a function h:N→ N such that η(G)≤ h(ω(G)) for every graph G∈ C, where η(G) denotes smallest cardinality of a hitting set of all maximum stable sets in G, and ω(G) is the clique number of G. Also, C is said to be polynomially η-bounded if in addition h can be chosen to be a polynomial. We introduce η-boundedness inspired by a question of Alon and motivated by a number of meaningful similarities to -boundedness. In particular, we propose an analogue of the Gy\'arf\'as-Sumner conjecture, that the class of all H-free graphs is η-bounded if (and only if) H is a forest. Like -boundedness, the case where H is a star is easy to verify, and we prove two non-trivial extensions of this: H-free graphs are η-bounded if (1) H has a vertex incident with all edges of H, or (2) H can be obtained from a star by subdividing at most one edge, exactly once. Unlike -boundedness, the case where H is a path is surprisingly hard. Our main result mentioned at the beginning shows that P5-free graphs are η-bounded. The proof is rather involved compared to the classical ``Gy\'arf\'as path'' argument which establishes, for all t, the -boundedness of Pt-free graphs. It remains open whether Pt-free graphs are η-bounded for t≥ 6. It also remains open whether P5-free graphs are polynomially η-bounded, which, if true, would imply the Erdos-Hajnal conjecture for P5-free graphs. But we prove that H-free graphs are polynomially η-bounded if H is a proper induced subgraph of P5.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.