Is the large-scale structure traced by the BOSS LOWZ galaxies consistent with Planck?

Abstract

Recently, several studies reported a significant discrepancy between the clustering and lensing of the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS) galaxies in the Planck cosmology. We construct a simple yet powerful model based on the linear theory to assess whether this discrepancy points toward deviations from Planck. Focusing on scales 10<R<30 h-1Mpc, we model the amplitudes of clustering and lensing of BOSS LOWZ galaxies using three parameters: galaxy bias bg, galaxy-matter cross-correlation coefficient rgm, and A, defined as the ratio between the true and Planck values of σ8. Using the cross-correlation matrix as a diagnostic, we detect systematic uncertainties that drive spurious correlations among the low-mass galaxies. After building a clean LOWZ sample with rgm1, we derive a joint constraint of bg and A from clustering+lensing, yielding bg=2.47-0.30+0.36 and A=0.81-0.09+0.10, i.e., a 2σ tension with Planck. However, due to the strong degeneracy between bg and A, systematic uncertainties in bg could masquerade as a tension with A=1. To ascertain this possibility, we develop a new method to measure bg from the cluster-galaxy cross-correlation and cluster weak lensing using an overlapping cluster sample. By applying the independent bias measurement (bg=1.760.22) as a prior, we successfully break the degeneracy and derive stringent constraints of bg=2.02-0.15+0.16 and A=0.960.07. Therefore, our result suggests that the large-scale clustering and lensing of LOWZ galaxies are consistent with Planck, while the different bias estimates may be related to some observational systematics in the target selection.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…