Defining Z using unit groups
Abstract
We consider first-order definability and decidability questions over rings of integers of algebraic extensions of , paying attention to the uniformity of definitions. The uniformity follows from the simplicity of our first-order definition of . Namely, we prove that for a large collection of algebraic extensions K/, \x ∈ K : ∀ ∈ K× \;∃ δ ∈ K× such that δ-1 (-1)x (-1)2\ = where K denotes the ring of integers of K. One of the corollaries of our results is undecidability of the field of constructible numbers, a question posed by Tarski in 1948.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.