Non-Cayley-Isomorphic Cayley graphs from non-Cayley-Isomorphic Cayley digraphs

Abstract

A finite group G is a "non-DCI group" if there exist subsets S1 and S2 of G, such that the associated Cayley digraphs Cay(G;S1) and Cay(G;S2) are isomorphic, but no automorphism of G carries S1 to S2. Furthermore, G is a "non-CI group" if the subsets S1 and S2 can be chosen to be closed under inverses, so we have undirected Cayley graphs Cay(G;S1) and Cay(G;S2). We show that if p is a prime number, and the elementary abelian p-group (Zp)r is a non-DCI group, then (Zp)r+3 is a non-CI group. In most cases, we can also show that (Zp)r+2 is a non-CI group. In particular, from Pablo Spiga's proof that (Zp)8 is a non-DCI group, we conclude that (Z3)10 is a non-CI group. This is the first example of a non-CI elementary abelian 3-group.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…