Z38 is not a CI-group
Abstract
A Cayley graph Cay(G;S) has the CI (Cayley Isomorphism) property if for every isomorphic graph Cay(G;T), there is a group automorphism α of G such that Sα=T. The DCI (Directed Cayley Isomorphism) property is defined analogously on digraphs. A group G is a CI-group if every Cayley graph on G has the CI property, and is a DCI-group if every Cayley digraph on G has the DCI property. Since a graph is a special type of digraph, this means that every DCI-group is a CI-group, and if a group is not a CI-group then it is not a DCI-group, but there are well-known examples of groups that are CI-groups but not DCI-groups. In 2009, Spiga showed that Z38 is not a DCI-group, by producing a digraph that does not have the DCI property. He also showed that Z35 is a DCI-group (and therefore also a CI-group). Until recently the question of whether there are elementary abelian 3-groups that are not CI-groups remained open. In a recent preprint with Dave Witte Morris, we showed that Z310 is not a CI-group. In this paper we show that with slight modifications, the underlying undirected graph of order 38 described by Spiga is does not have the CI property, so Z38 is not a CI-group.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.