Hamiltonicity of 1-tough (P2 kP1)-free graphs

Abstract

Given a graph H, a graph G is H-free if G does not contain H as an induced subgraph. For a positive real number t, a non-complete graph G is said to be t-tough if for every vertex cut S of G, the ratio of |S| to the number of components of G-S is at least t. A complete graph is said to be t-tough for any t>0. Chv\'atal's toughness conjecture, stating that there exists a constant t0 such that every t0-tough graph with at least three vertices is Hamiltonian, is still open in general. Chv\'atal and Erd\"os CE proved that, for any integer k 1, every \2,k\-connected (k+1)P1-free graph on at least three vertices is Hamiltonian. Along the Chv\'atal-Erd\"os theorem, Shi and Shan SS proved that, for any integer k 4, every 4-tough 2k-connected (P2 kP1)-free graph with at least three vertices is Hamiltonian, and furthermore, they proposed a conjecture that for any integer k 1, any 1-tough 2k-connected (P2 kP1)-free graph is Hamiltonian. In this paper, we confirm the conjecture, and furthermore, we show that if k 3, then the condition `2k-connected' may be weakened to be `2(k-1)-connected'. As an immediate consequence, for any integer k 3, every (k-1)-tough (P2 kP1)-free graph is Hamiltonian. This improves the result of Hatfield and Grimm HG, stating that every 3-tough (P2 3P1)-free graph is Hamiltonian.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…