Isolation of regular graphs, stars and k-chromatic graphs
Abstract
Given a set F of graphs, we call a copy of a graph in F an F-graph. The F-isolation number of a graph G, denoted by (G,F), is the size of a smallest set D of vertices of G such that the closed neighbourhood of D intersects the vertex sets of the F-graphs contained by G (equivalently, G - N[D] contains no F-graph). Thus, (G,\K1\) is the domination number of G. Clearly, (G, F) ≤ (G, F H). For any integer k ≥ 1, let F0,k be the set consisting of the k-star K1,k, let F1,k be the set of regular graphs whose degree is at least k-1, let F2,k be the set of graphs whose chromatic number is at least k, and let F3,k be the union F0,k F1,k F2,k. We prove that if G is a connected n-vertex graph, then (G, F3,k) ≤ nk+1 unless G is a k-clique or k = 2 and G is a 5-cycle. This generalizes a classical bound of Ore on the domination number, a bound of Caro and Hansberg and of \.Zyli\'nski on the vertex-edge domination number, a bound of Fenech, Kaemawichanurat and the author on the k-clique isolation number, a bound of the author on the cycle isolation number, and a bound of Caro and Hansberg on the F0,k-isolation number. The proof features a new strategy. For i = 1, 2, 3, the bound nk+1 on (G, Fi,k) is attainable if k+1 divides n. Our second main result is that the bound nk+1 on (G, F0,k) is attainable if and only if n is 0 or k+1 or 2(k+1). We pose some problems and conjectures, and establish additional intriguing phenomena concerning k-star isolation and k-cycle isolation.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.