A note on the degree of ill-posedness for mixed differentiation on the d-dimensional unit cube
Abstract
Numerical differentiation of a function, contaminated with noise, over the unit interval [0,1] ⊂ R by inverting the simple integration operator J:L2([0,1]) L2([0,1]) defined as [Jx](s):=∫0s x(t) dt is discussed extensively in the literature. The complete singular system of the compact operator J is explicitly given with singular values σn(J) asymptotically proportional to 1/n, which indicates a degree one of ill-posedness for this inverse problem. We recall the concept of the degree of ill-posedness for linear operator equations with compact forward operators in Hilbert spaces. In contrast to the one-dimensional case with operator J, there is little material available about the analysis of the d-dimensional case, where the compact integral operator Jd:L2([0,1]d) L2([0,1]d) defined as [Jd\,x](s1,…,sd):=∫0s1…∫0sd x(t1,…,td)\, dtd… dt1 over unit d-cube is to be inverted. This inverse problem of mixed differentiation x(s1,…,sd)=∂d∂ s1 … ∂ sd y(s1,… ,sd) is of practical interest, for example when in statistics copula densities have to be verified from empirical copulas over [0,1]d ⊂ Rd. In this note, we prove that the non-increasingly ordered singular values σn(Jd) of the operator Jd have an asymptotics of the form ( n)d-1n, which shows that the degree of ill-posedness stays at one, even though an additional logarithmic factor occurs. Some more discussion refers to the special case d=2 for characterizing the range R(J2) of the operator J2.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.