Efficient Sampling of Stochastic Differential Equations with Positive Semi-Definite Models

Abstract

This paper deals with the problem of efficient sampling from a stochastic differential equation, given the drift function and the diffusion matrix. The proposed approach leverages a recent model for probabilities rudi2021psd (the positive semi-definite -- PSD model) from which it is possible to obtain independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) samples at precision with a cost that is m2 d (1/) where m is the dimension of the model, d the dimension of the space. The proposed approach consists in: first, computing the PSD model that satisfies the Fokker-Planck equation (or its fractional variant) associated with the SDE, up to error , and then sampling from the resulting PSD model. Assuming some regularity of the Fokker-Planck solution (i.e. β-times differentiability plus some geometric condition on its zeros) We obtain an algorithm that: (a) in the preparatory phase obtains a PSD model with L2 distance from the solution of the equation, with a model of dimension m = -(d+1)/(β-2s) ((1/))d+1 where 1/2≤ s≤1 is the fractional power to the Laplacian, and total computational complexity of O(m3.5 (1/)) and then (b) for Fokker-Planck equation, it is able to produce i.i.d.\ samples with error in Wasserstein-1 distance, with a cost that is O(d -2(d+1)/β-2 (1/)2d+3) per sample. This means that, if the probability associated with the SDE is somewhat regular, i.e. β ≥ 4d+2, then the algorithm requires O(-0.88 (1/)4.5d) in the preparatory phase, and O(-1/2(1/)2d+2) for each sample. Our results suggest that as the true solution gets smoother, we can circumvent the curse of dimensionality without requiring any sort of convexity.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…