Boxing inequalities in Banach spaces and Riemannian manifolds

Abstract

We prove the following result: For each closed n-dimensional manifold M in a (finite or infinite-dimensional) Banach space B, and each positive real m≤ n there exists a pseudomanifold Wn+1⊂ B such that ∂ Wn+1=Mn and HCm(Wn+1)≤ c(m) HCm(Mn). Here HCm(X) denotes the m-dimensional Hausdorff content, i.e the infimum of i rim, where the infimum is taken over all coverings of X by a finite collection of open metric balls, and ri denote the radii of these balls. In the classical case, when B=Rn+1, this result implies that if ⊂ Rn+1 is a bounded domain, then for all m∈ (0,n] HCm()≤ c(m) HCm(∂ ). This inequality seems to be new despite being well-known and widely used in the case, when m=n (Gustin's boxing inequality, [G]). The result is a corollary of the following more general theorem that strengthens a theorem in [LLNR]: For each compact subset X in a Banach space B and positive real number m such that HCm(X)= 0 there exists a finite ( m-1)-dimensional simplicial complex K⊂ B, a continuous map φ:X K, and a homotopy H:X× [0,1] B between the inclusion of X and φ (regarded as a map into B) such that: (1) For each x∈ X x-φ(x)B≤ c1(m) HCm1m(X); (2) HCm(H(X× [0,1]))≤ c2(m) HCm(X). A similar theorem can also be proven in the case when B is a metric space with a linear contractibility function and applies to all compact sets X with a controllably small HCm in Riemannian manifolds Mn with the sectional curvature bounded below, the volume bounded below by a positive number, and the diameter bounded above.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…