Tight Correlation Bounds for Circuits Between AC0 and TC0

Abstract

We initiate the study of generalized AC0 circuits comprised of negations and arbitrary unbounded fan-in gates that only need to be constant over inputs of Hamming weight k, which we denote GC0(k). The gate set of this class includes biased LTFs like the k-OR (output 1 iff k bits are 1) and k-AND (output 0 iff k bits are 0), and thus can be seen as an interpolation between AC0 and TC0. We establish a tight multi-switching lemma for GC0(k) circuits, which bounds the probability that several depth-2 GC0(k) circuits do not simultaneously simplify under a random restriction. We also establish a new depth reduction lemma such that coupled with our multi-switching lemma, we can show many results obtained from the multi-switching lemma for depth-d size-s AC0 circuits lifts to depth-d size-s.99 GC0(.01 s) circuits with no loss in parameters (other than hidden constants). Our result has the following applications: 1.Size-2(n1/d) depth-d GC0((n1/d)) circuits do not correlate with parity (extending a result of Hstad (SICOMP, 2014)). 2. Size-n( n) GC0((2 n)) circuits with n.249 arbitrary threshold gates or n.499 arbitrary symmetric gates exhibit exponentially small correlation against an explicit function (extending a result of Tan and Servedio (RANDOM, 2019)). 3. There is a seed length O(( m)d-1(m/)(m)) pseudorandom generator against size-m depth-d GC0( m) circuits, matching the AC0 lower bound of Hstad stad up to a m factor (extending a result of Lyu (CCC, 2022)). 4. Size-m GC0( m) circuits have exponentially small Fourier tails (extending a result of Tal (CCC, 2017)).

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…