Cosmological application of the lens-redshift probability distribution with improved galaxy-scale gravitational lensing sample

Abstract

We conduct the cosmological analysis by using the lens-redshift distribution test with updated galaxy-scale strong lensing sample, where the considered scenarios involve three typical cosmological models (i.e., , ωCDM and ω0ωaCDM models) and three typical choices (i.e., non-evolving, power-law and exponential forms) for the velocity-dispersion distribution function (VDF) of lens galaxies. It shows that degeneracies between cosmological and VDF parameters lead to the shifts of estimates on the parameters. The limits on m0 from the lens-redshift distribution are consistent with those from the Pantheon+ Type Ia supernova (SN Ia) sample at 68.3% confidence level, though the uncertainties on m0 from the former are about 3 to 8 times larger than those from the latter. The mean values of m0 shift to the larger values in the power-law VDF case and to the lower values in the exponential VDF case, compared with those obtained in the non-evolving VDF case. In the ωCDM model, the limits on ω0, i.e. the dark energy equation of state (EoS), are consistent with those from the Pantheon+ sample at 68.3% confidence level, but the mean values of ω0 from the former are significantly smaller than those from the latter. In the ω0ωaCDM model, the uncertainties on ω0 are dramatically enlarged compared with those obtained in the ωCDM model; moreover, the Markov chains of ωa, i.e. the time-varying slope of EoS, do not achieve convergence in the three VDF cases. Overall, the lens-redshift distribution test is more effective on constraining m0 than on the dark energy EoS.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…