Simple Combinatorial Construction of the ko(1)-Lower Bound for Approximating the Parameterized k-Clique
Abstract
In the parameterized k-clique problem, or k-Clique for short, we are given a graph G and a parameter k 1. The goal is to decide whether there exist k vertices in G that induce a complete subgraph (i.e., a k-clique). This problem plays a central role in the theory of parameterized intractability as one of the first W[1]-complete problems. Existing research has shown that even an FPT-approximation algorithm for k-Clique with arbitrary ratio does not exist, assuming the Gap-Exponential-Time Hypothesis (Gap-ETH) [Chalermsook et al., FOCS'17 and SICOMP]. However, whether this inapproximability result can be based on the standard assumption of W 1 FPT remains unclear. The recent breakthrough of Bingkai Lin [STOC'21] and subsequent works by Karthik C.S. and Khot [CCC'22], and by Lin, Ren, Sun Wang [ICALP'22] give a technique that bypasses Gap-ETH, thus leading to the inapproximability ratio of O(1) and ko(1) under W[1]-hardness (the first two) and ETH (for the latter one). All the work along this line follows the framework developed by Lin, which starts from the k-vector-sum problem and requires some involved algebraic techniques. This paper presents an alternative framework for proving the W[1]-hardness of the ko(1)-FPT-inapproximability of k-Clique. Using this framework, we obtain a gap-producing self-reduction of k-Clique without any intermediate algebraic problem. More precisely, we reduce from (k,k-1)-Gap Clique to (qk, qk-1)-Gap Clique, for any function q depending only on the parameter k, thus implying the ko(1)-inapproximability result when q is sufficiently large. Our proof is relatively simple and mostly combinatorial. At the core of our construction is a novel encoding of k-element subset stemming from the theory of "network coding" and a "Sidon set" representation of a graph.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.