The combinatorial and gauge-theoretic foam evaluation functors are not the same

Abstract

Kronheimer and Mrowka used gauge theory to define a functor J from a category of webs in R3 to the category of finite-dimensional vector spaces over the field of two elements. They also suggested a possible combinatorial replacement J for J, which Khovanov and Robert proved is well-defined on a subcategory of planar webs. We exhibit a counterexample that shows the restriction of the functor J to the subcategory of planar webs is not the same as J.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…