High-redshift metallicity calibrations for JWST spectra: insights from line emission in cosmological simulations

Abstract

Optical emission-line ratios are traditionally used to estimate gas metallicities from observed galaxy spectra. While such estimators have been calibrated primarily at low redshift, they are commonly used to study high-redshift galaxies, where their applicability may be questioned. We use comprehensive emission-line catalogues of galaxies from the IllustrisTNG simulation including ionization by stars, active nuclei and shocks to reassess the calibrations of both optical and ultraviolet metallicity estimators at redshifts 0 ≥ z ≥ 8. For present-day galaxies, the predicted optical-line calibrations are consistent with previously published ones, while we find different ultraviolet-line ratios, such as HeIIλ1640/CIII]λ1908, to provide powerful metallicity diagnostics. At fixed metallicity, most emission-line ratios are predicted to strongly increase or decrease with redshift (with the notable exception of N2O2=[NII]λ6584/[OII]λ3727), primarily because of a change in ionization parameter. The predicted dependence of R3=[OIII]λ5007/Hβ and R23=([OII]λ3727+[OIII]λλ4959,5007)/Hβ, and to a slightly lesser extent R2=[OII]λ3727/Hβ and O32=[OIII]λ5007/[OII]λ3727, on O abundance for galaxies at z=4-8 agrees remarkably well with Te-based measurements in 14 galaxies observed with JWST. This success leads us to provide new calibrations of optical and ultraviolet metallicity estimators specifically designed for galaxies at z > 4, to guide interpretations of future, high-redshift spectroscopic surveys. We further demonstrate that applying classical z = 0 calibrations to high-redshift galaxies can bias O-abundance estimates downward by up to 1 dex, leading to the conclusion of a stronger evolution of the mass-metallicity relation than the actual one.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…