"Dust Giant": Extended and Clumpy Star-Formation in a Massive Dusty Galaxy at z=1.38

Abstract

We present NOEMA CO (2-1) line and ALMA 870 μm continuum observations of a main-sequence galaxy at z=1.38. The galaxy was initially selected as a "gas-giant", based on the gas mass derived from sub-mm continuum (log(M gas/M)=11.200.20), however the gas mass derived from CO (2-1) luminosity brings down the gas mass to a value consistent with typical star-forming galaxies at that redshift (log(M gas/M)=10.840.03). Despite that the dust-to-stellar mass ratio remains elevated above the scaling relations by a factor of 5. We explore the potential physical picture and consider an underestimated stellar mass and optically thick dust as possible causes. Based on the updated gas-to-stellar mass ratio we rule out the former, and while the latter can contribute to the dust mass overestimate it is still not sufficient to explain the observed physical picture. Instead, possible explanations include enhanced HI reservoirs, CO-dark H2 gas, an unusually high metallicity, or the presence of an optically dark, dusty contaminant. Using the ALMA data at 870 μm coupled with HST/ACS imaging, we find extended morphology in dust continuum and clumpy star-formation in rest-frame UV in this galaxy, and a tentative 10 kpc dusty arm is found bridging the galaxy center and a clump in F814W image. The galaxy shows levels of dust obscuration similar to the so-called HST-dark galaxies at higher redshifts, and would fall into the optically faint/dark JWST color-color selection at z>2. It is therefore possible that our object could serve as low-z analog of the HST-dark populations. This galaxy serves as a caveat to the gas masses based on the continuum alone, with a larger sample required to unveil the full picture.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…