Chromatic number is not tournament-local
Abstract
Scott and Seymour conjectured the existence of a function f N N such that, for every graph G and tournament T on the same vertex set, (G) ≥slant f(k) implies that (G[NT+(v)]) ≥slant k for some vertex v. In this note we disprove this conjecture even if v is replaced by a vertex set of size O( V(G)). As a consequence, we answer in the negative a question of Harutyunyan, Le, Thomass\'e, and Wu concerning the corresponding statement where the graph G is replaced by another tournament, and disprove a related conjecture of Nguyen, Scott, and Seymour. We also show that the setting where chromatic number is replaced by degeneracy exhibits a quite different behaviour.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.