Examination of outer-layer similarity in wall turbulence over obstructed surfaces

Abstract

Turbulent flows over canopies of rigid filaments with different densities, λf, are studied using direct simulations at Reynolds numbers Reτ≈550-1000. The canopies have heights h+≈110-220, and are an instance of obstructing substrate. We show that conventional methods used to determine the zero-plane displacement can be at odds with proper outer-layer similarity and may not be applicable for flows at moderate Reτ. Instead, we determine y and the length and velocity scales that recover outer-layer similarity by minimising the difference between the smooth-wall and canopy diagnostic function everywhere above the roughness sublayer, not just in the logarithmic layer. We also investigate if the zero-plane displacement and the friction velocity can be set independently, but find that outer-layer similarity is more consistently recovered when they are coupled. Our results suggest a modified outer-layer similarity, where the K\'arm\'an constant, , is not 0.39, but turbulence is otherwise smooth-wall-like. When the canopy is dense, the flow above the tips is essentially smooth-wall-like, with smooth-wall-like ≈0.39 and origin essentially at the tip plane. For intermediate densities, the overlying flow perceives a deeper zero-plane displacement, in agreement with previous studies, but exhibits a lower K\'arm\'an constant, ≈0.34-0.36. For sparse canopies, tends back to its smooth-wall value, and the zero-plane-displacement height is at the canopy bed. For all canopies studied, the decrease in never exceeds 15%, which is significantly less than that obtained in some previous works using conventional methods to assess outer-layer similarity.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…