Colouring random graphs: Tame colourings

Abstract

Given a graph G, a colouring is an assignment of colours to the vertices of G so that no two adjacent vertices are coloured the same. If all colour classes have size at most t, then we call the colouring t-bounded, and the t-bounded chromatic number of G, denoted by t(G), is the minimum number of colours in such a colouring. Every colouring of G is then α(G)-bounded, where α(G) denotes the size of a largest independent set. We study colourings of the random graph G(n, 1/2) and of the corresponding uniform random graph G(n,m) with m= 12 n 2 . We show that t(G(n,m)) is maximally concentrated on at most two explicit values for t = α(G(n,m))-2. This behaviour stands in stark contrast to that of the normal chromatic number, which was recently shown not to be concentrated on any sequence of intervals of length n1/2-o(1). Moreover, when t = α(Gn, 1/2)-1 and if the expected number of independent sets of size t is not too small, we determine an explicit interval of length n0.99 that contains t(Gn,1/2) with high probability. Both results have profound consequences: the former is at the core of the intriguing Zigzag Conjecture on the distribution of (Gn, 1/2) and justifies one of its main hypotheses, while the latter is an important ingredient in the proof of a non-concentration result for (Gn,1/2) that is conjectured to be optimal. These two results are consequences of a more general statement. We consider a class of colourings that we call tame, and provide tight bounds for the probability of existence of such colourings via a delicate second moment argument. We then apply those bounds to the two aforementioned cases. As a further consequence of our main result, we prove two-point concentration of the equitable chromatic number of G(n,m).

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…