Investigating the accelerated expansion of the Universe through updated constraints on viable f(R) models within the metric formalism

Abstract

Modified theories of gravity encompass a class of f(R)-models that seek to elucidate the observed late time accelerated expansion of the universe. In this study, we examine a set of viable f(R) models (Hu-Sawicki: two cases, Satrobinsky, Tsujikawa, exponential and arcTanh models) in metric formalism, using recent cosmological data sets: type Ia supernovae data, cosmic chronometer observations, baryonic acoustic oscillations data, data from Hii starburst galaxies, and local measurements of the Hubble parameter H0. The model parameters are constrained using a Bayesian analysis with the Monte Carlo Markov Chain method. We employ statistical tools such as the Akaike Information Criterion, Bayesian Information Criterion, and reduced chi-square statistics to conduct a comparative investigation of these models. We determine the transition redshift, the evolution of total equation-of-state (EoS) parameter, and the EoS for the component responsible for current accelerated expansion to characterize the expansion's evolution. Taking into account the ``Hubble tension," we perform the study with and without a Gaussian prior for H0 from local measurements. Our findings are as follows: (i) in many cases the f(R) models are strongly favored over the standard model, (ii) the deviation parameter (b) significantly deviates from zero in several cases, (iii) the inclusion of local H0 not only increases the fitted value of H0 (as expected) but also affects the gap between predictions of f(R) models and the model, and (iv) the relevant quantities characterizing the (accelerated) expansion of the universe obtained in our models are consistent with those obtained in a model-independent way by others. Our investigation and results present a compelling case for pursuing further research on f(R) models with future observations to come.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…