On the Functions Which are CCZ-equivalent but not EA-equivalent to Quadratic Functions over Fpn
Abstract
For a given function F from Fpn to itself, determining whether there exists a function which is CCZ-equivalent but EA-inequivalent to F is a very important and interesting problem. For example, K\"olsch KOL21 showed that there is no function which is CCZ-equivalent but EA-inequivalent to the inverse function. On the other hand, for the cases of Gold function F(x)=x2i+1 and F(x)=x3+ Tr(x9) over F2n, Budaghyan, Carlet and Pott (respectively, Budaghyan, Carlet and Leander) BCP06, BCL09FFTA found functions which are CCZ-equivalent but EA-inequivalent to F. In this paper, when a given function F has a component function which has a linear structure, we present functions which are CCZ-equivalent to F, and if suitable conditions are satisfied, the constructed functions are shown to be EA-inequivalent to F. As a consequence, for every quadratic function F on F2n (n≥ 4) with nonlinearity >0 and differential uniformity ≤ 2n-3, we explicitly construct functions which are CCZ-equivalent but EA-inequivalent to F. Also for every non-planar quadratic function on Fpn (p>2, n≥ 4) with | WF|≤ pn-1 and differential uniformity ≤ pn-3, we explicitly construct functions which are CCZ-equivalent but EA-inequivalent to F.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.