Failure of Khintchine-type results along the polynomial image of IP0 sets

Abstract

In "IP-sets and polynomial recurrence", Bergelson, Furstenberg, and McCutcheon established the following far reaching extension of Khintchine's recurrence theorem: For any invertible probability preserving system (X, A,μ,T), any non-constant polynomial p∈ Z[x] with p(0)=0, any A∈ A, and any ε>0, the set Rεp(A)=\n∈ N\,|\,μ(A T-p(n)A)>μ2(A)-ε\ is IP*, meaning that for any increasing sequence (nk)k∈ N in N, FS((nk)k∈ N) Rεp(A)≠ , where FS((nk)k∈ N)=\Σj∈ Fnj\,|\,F⊂eq N\, is finite and F≠\=\nk1+·s+nkt\,|\,k1<·s<kt,\,t∈ N\. In view of the potential new applications to combinatorics, this result has led to the question of whether a further strengthening of Khintchine's recurrence theorem holds, namely whether the set Rεp(A) is IP0* meaning that there exists a t∈ N such that for any finite sequence n1<·s<nt in N, \Σj∈ Fnj\,|\,F⊂eq \1,...,t\ and F≠ \ Rεp(A)≠ . In this paper we give a negative answer to this question by showing that for any given polynomial p∈ Z[x] with deg(p)>1 and p(0)=0 there is an invertible probability preserving system (X, A,μ,T), a set A∈ A, and an ε>0 for which the set Rεp(A) is not IP0*.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…