Non-Classifiability of Kolmogorov Diffeomorphisms up to Isomorphism
Abstract
We consider the problem of classifying Kolmogorov automorphisms (or K-automorphisms for brevity) up to isomorphism. Within the collection of measure-preserving transformations, Bernoulli shifts have the ultimate mixing property, and K-automorphisms have the next-strongest mixing properties of any widely considered family of transformations. J. Feldman observed that unlike Bernoulli shifts, the family of K-automorphisms cannot be classified up to isomorphism by a complete numerical Borel invariant. This left open the possibility of classifying K-automorphisms with a more complex type of Borel invariant. We show that this is impossible, by proving that the isomorphism equivalence relation restricted to K-automorphisms, considered as a subset of the Cartesian product of the set of K-automorphisms with itself, is a complete analytic set, and hence not Borel. Moreover, we prove this remains true if we restrict consideration to K-automorphisms that are also C∞ diffeomorphisms. This shows in a concrete way that the problem of classifying K-automorphisms up to isomorphism is intractible.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.