Light-Quark SU(3) Flavour Splitting of Heavy-Light Constituent Diquark Masses and Doubly-Strange Diquarks from QCD Sum-Rules

Abstract

QCD Laplace sum-rules are used to examine the constituent mass spectrum of JP∈\0+,1+\ heavy-light [Qq] diquarks with Q∈\c,b\ and q∈\u,d,s\. As in previous sum-rule studies, the negative parity JP∈\0-, 1-\ [Qq] diquark mass predictions do not stabilize, so the sum-rule analysis focuses on positive parity [Qq] diquarks. Doubly-strange JP=1+ [ss] diquarks are also examined, but the resulting sum rules do not stabilize. Hence there is no sum-rule evidence for JP=1+ [ss] diquark states, aiding the interpretation of sum-rule analyses of fully-strange tetraquark states. The SU(3) flavour splitting effects for [Qq] diquarks are obtained by calculating QCD correlation functions of JP∈\0+,1+\ diquark composite operators up to next-to-leading order in perturbation theory, leading-order in the strange quark mass, and in the chiral limit for non-strange (u,d) quarks with an isospin-symmetric vacuum < nn>=< uu>=< dd>. Apart from the strange quark mass parameter ms, the strange quark condensate parameter =< ss>/< nn> has an important impact on SU(3) flavour splittings. A Laplace sum-rule analysis methodology is developed for the mass difference M[Qs]-M[Qn] between the strange and non-strange heavy-light diquarks to reduce the theoretical uncertainties from all other QCD input parameters. The mass splitting is found to decrease with increasing , providing an upper bound on where the M[Qs]-M[Qn] mass hierarchy reverses. In the typical QCD sum-rule range 0.56<< 0.74, 55~MeV < M[cs]-M[cn] < 100~MeV and 75~MeV < M[bs]-M[bn]< 150~MeV, with a slight tendency for larger splittings for the JP=1+ channels. These constituent mass splitting results are discussed in comparison with values used in constituent diquark models for tetraquark and pentaquark hadronic states.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…