Breaking a Barrier in Constructing Compact Indexes for Parameterized Pattern Matching

Abstract

A parameterized string (p-string) is a string over an alphabet (s p), where s and p are disjoint alphabets for static symbols (s-symbols) and for parameter symbols (p-symbols), respectively. Two p-strings x and y are said to parameterized match (p-match) if and only if x can be transformed into y by applying a bijection on p to every occurrence of p-symbols in x. The indexing problem for p-matching is to preprocess a p-string T of length n so that we can efficiently find the occurrences of substrings of T that p-match with a given pattern. Extending the Burrows-Wheeler Transform (BWT) based index for exact string pattern matching, Ganguly et al. [SODA 2017] proposed the first compact index (named pBWT) for p-matching, and posed an open problem on how to construct it in compact space, i.e., in O(n |s p|) bits of space. Hashimoto et al. [SPIRE 2022] partially solved this problem by showing how to construct some components of pBWTs for T in O(n |p| n n) time in an online manner while reading the symbols of T from right to left. In this paper, we improve the time complexity to O(n |p| n n). We remark that removing the multiplicative factor of |p| from the complexity is of great interest because it has not been achieved for over a decade in the construction of related data structures like parameterized suffix arrays even in the offline setting. We also show that our data structure can support backward search, a core procedure of BWT-based indexes, at any stage of the online construction, making it the first compact index for p-matching that can be constructed in compact space and even in an online manner.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…