Improved test-retest reliability of R2* and susceptibility quantification using multi-shot multi echo 3D EPI

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the potential of 3D echo-planar imaging (EPI) for improving the reliability of T2*-weighted (T2*w) data and quantification of R2* decay rate and susceptibility () compared to conventional gradient echo (GRE)-based acquisition. Eight healthy subjects in a wide age range were recruited. Each subject received repeated scans for both GRE and EPI acquisitions with an isotropic 1 mm resolution at 3 T. Maps of R2* and were quantified and compared using their inter-scan difference to evaluate the test-retest reliability. Inter-protocol differences of R2* and between GRE and EPI were also measured voxel by voxel and in selected ROIs to test the consistency between the two acquisition methods. The quantifications of R2* and using EPI protocols showed increased test-retest reliability with higher EPI factors up to 5 as performed in the experiment and were consistent with those based on GRE. This result suggested multi-shot multi-echo 3D EPI can be a useful alternative acquisition method for T2*w MRI and quantification of R2* and with reduced scan time, improved test-retest reliability and similar accuracy compared to commonly used 3D GRE.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…