Low dimensional algebraic complexes over integral group rings

Abstract

The realization problem asks: When does an algebraic complex arise, up to homotopy, from a geometric complex? In the case of 2- dimensional algebraic complexes, this is equivalent to the D2 problem, which asks when homological methods can distinguish between 2 and 3 dimensional complexes. We approach the realization problem (and hence the D2 problem) by classifying all possible algebraic 2- complexes and showing that they are realized. We show that if a dihedral group has order 2n, then the algebraic complexes over it are parametrized by their second homology groups, which we refer to as algebraic second homotopy groups. A cancellation theorem of Swan ([11]), then allows us to solve the realization problem for the group D8. Let X be a finite geometric 2- complex. Standard isomorphisms and Schanuel's lemma imply that the stable class of pi2(X) is determined by pi1(X). We show how pi3(X) may be calculated similarly. Specifically,we show that as a module over the fundamental group, pi3(X) is the symmetric part of the module pi2(X) otimes pi2(X). As a consequence, we are able to show that when the order of pi1(X) is odd, the stable class of pi3(X) is also determined by pi1(X). Given a closed, connected, orientable 5- dimensional manifold, with finite fundamental group, we may represent it, up to homotopy equivalence, by an algebraic complex. Poincare duality induces a homotopy equivalence between this algebraic complex and its dual. We consider how similar this homotopy equivalence may be made to the identity, (through appropriate choice of algebraic complex). We show that it can be taken to be the identity on 4 of the 6 terms of the chain complex. However a homological obstruction prevents it from being the identity.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…