Characterizing existence of certain ultrafilters

Abstract

Following Baumgartner [J. Symb. Log. 60 (1995), no. 2], for an ideal I on ω, we say that an ultrafilter U on ω is an I-ultrafilter if for every function f:ωω there is A∈ U with f[A]∈ I. If there is an I-ultrafilter which is not a J-ultrafilter, then I is not below J in the Katetov order ≤K (i.e. for every function f:ωω there is A∈ I with f-1[A] J). On the other hand, in general I≤KJ does not imply that existence of an I-ultrafilter which is not a J-ultrafilter is consistent. We provide some sufficient conditions on ideals to obtain the equivalence: I≤KJ if and only if it is consistent that there exists an I-ultrafilter which is not a J-ultrafilter. In some cases when the Katetov order is not enough for the above equivalence, we provide other conditions for which a similar equivalence holds. We are mainly interested in the cases when the family of all I-ultrafilters or J-ultrafilters coincides with some known family of ultrafilters: P-points, Q-points or selective ultrafilters (a.k.a. Ramsey ultrafilters). In particular, our results provide a characterization of Borel ideals I which can be used to characterize P-points as I-ultrafilters. Moreover, we introduce a cardinal invariant which is used to obtain a sufficient condition for the existence of an I-ultrafilter which is not a I-ultrafilter. Finally, we prove some new results concerning existence of certain ultrafilters under various set-theoretic assumptions.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…