A lower bound on the multicolor size-Ramsey numbers of paths in hypergraphs
Abstract
The r-color size-Ramsey number of a k-uniform hypergraph H, denoted by Rr(H), is the minimum number of edges in a k-uniform hypergraph G such that for every r-coloring of the edges of G there exists a monochromatic copy of H. In the case of 2-uniform paths Pn, it is known that (r2n)=Rr(Pn)=O((r2 r)n) with the best bounds essentially due to Krivelevich. In a recent breakthrough result, Letzter, Pokrovskiy, and Yepremyan gave a linear upper bound on the r-color size-Ramsey number of the k-uniform tight path Pn(k); i.e. Rr(Pn(k))=Or,k(n). Winter gave the first non-trivial lower bounds on the 2-color size-Ramsey number of Pn(k) for k≥ 3; i.e. R2(Pn(3))≥ 83n-O(1) and R2(Pn(k))≥ 2(k+1) n-Ok(1) for k≥ 4. We consider the problem of giving a lower bound on the r-color size-Ramsey number of Pn(k) (for fixed k and growing r). Our main result is that Rr(Pn(k))=k(rkn) which generalizes the best known lower bound for graphs mentioned above. One of the key elements of our proof is a determination of the correct order of magnitude of the r-color size-Ramsey number of every sufficiently short tight path; i.e. Rr(Pk+m(k))=k(rm) for all 1≤ m≤ k. All of our results generalize to -overlapping k-uniform paths Pn(k, ). In particular we note that when 1≤ ≤ k2, we have k(r2n)=Rr(Pn(k, ))=O((r2 r)n) which essentially matches the best known bounds for graphs mentioned above. Additionally, in the case k=3, =2, and r=2, we give a more precise estimate which implies R2(P(3)n)≥ 289n-O(1), improving on the above-mentioned lower bound of Winter in the case k=3.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.