On nonrepetitive colorings of paths and cycles
Abstract
We say that a sequence a1 ·s a2t of integers is repetitive if ai = ai+t for every i∈\1,…,t\. A walk in a graph G is a sequence v1 ·s vr of vertices of G in which vivi+1∈ E(G) for every i∈\1,…,r-1\. Given a k-coloring c V(G)\1,…,k\ of V(G), we say that c is walk-nonrepetitive (resp. stroll-nonrepetitive) if for every t∈N and every walk v1·s v2t the sequence c(v1) ·s c(v2t) is not repetitive unless vi = vi+t for every i∈\1,…,t\ (resp. unless vi = vi+t for some i∈\1,…,t\). The walk (resp. stroll) chromatic number σ(G) (resp. (G)) of G is the minimum k for which G has a walk-nonrepetitive (resp. stroll-nonrepetitive) k-coloring. Let Cn and Pn denote, respectively, the cycle and the path with n vertices. In this paper we present three results that answer questions posed by Bar\'at and Wood in 2008: (i) σ(Cn) = 4 whenever n≥ 4 and n \5,7\; (ii) (Pn) = 3 if 3≤ n≤ 21 and (Pn) = 4 otherwise; and (iii) (Cn) = 4, whenever n \3,4,6,8\, and (Cn) = 3 otherwise. In particular, (ii) improves bounds on n obtained by Tao in 2023.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.