Separating Subversion Forcing Axioms

Abstract

We study a family of variants of Jensen'ssubcomplete forcing axiom, SCFA and subproper forcing axiom, SubPFA. Using these we develop a general technique for proving non-implications of SCFA, SubPFA and their relatives and give several applications. For instance we show that SCFA does not imply MA+(σ-closed) and SubPFA does not imply Martin's Maximum.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…