On graphs with maximum difference between game chromatic number and chromatic number

Abstract

In the vertex colouring game on a graph G, Maker and Breaker alternately colour vertices of G from a palette of k colours, with no two adjacent vertices allowed the same colour. Maker seeks to colour the whole graph while Breaker seeks to make some vertex impossible to colour. The game chromatic number of G, g(G), is the minimal number k of colours for which Maker has a winning strategy for the vertex colouring game. Matsumoto proved in 2019 that g(G)-(G)≤ n/2 - 1, and conjectured that the only equality cases are some graphs of small order and the Tur\'an graph T(2r,r) (i.e. K2r minus a perfect matching). We resolve this conjecture in the affirmative by considering a modification of the vertex colouring game wherein Breaker may remove a vertex instead of colouring it. Matsumoto further asked whether a similar result could be proved for the vertex marking game, and we provide an example to show that no such nontrivial result can exist.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…