Nearly Optimal Bounds for Sample-Based Testing and Learning of k-Monotone Functions
Abstract
We study monotonicity testing of functions f \0,1\d \0,1\ using sample-based algorithms, which are only allowed to observe the value of f on points drawn independently from the uniform distribution. A classic result by Bshouty-Tamon (J. ACM 1996) proved that monotone functions can be learned with (O(\1d,d\)) samples and it is not hard to show that this bound extends to testing. Prior to our work the only lower bound for this problem was Ω((d)/) in the small parameter regime, when = O(d-3/2), due to Goldreich-Goldwasser-Lehman-Ron-Samorodnitsky (Combinatorica 2000). Thus, the sample complexity of monotonicity testing was wide open for d-3/2. We resolve this question, obtaining a nearly tight lower bound of (Ω(\1d,d\)) for all at most a sufficiently small constant. In fact, we prove a much more general result, showing that the sample complexity of k-monotonicity testing and learning for functions f \0,1\d [r] is (Ω(\rkd,d\)). For testing with one-sided error we show that the sample complexity is (Θ(d)). Beyond the hypercube, we prove nearly tight bounds (up to polylog factors of d,k,r,1/ in the exponent) of (Θ(\rkd,d\)) on the sample complexity of testing and learning measurable k-monotone functions f Rd [r] under product distributions. Our upper bound improves upon the previous bound of (O(\k2d,d\)) by Harms-Yoshida (ICALP 2022) for Boolean functions (r=2).
Turn this paper into a full lesson
ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.