Cut-free sequent calculi for the provability logic D
Abstract
We say that a Kripke model is a GL-model if the accessibility relation is transitive and converse well-founded. We say that a Kripke model is a D-model if it is obtained by attaching infinitely many worlds t1, t2, …, and tω to a world t0 of a GL-model so that t0 t1 t2 ·s tω. A non-normal modal logic D, which was studied by Beklemishev (1999), is characterized as follows. A formula is a theorem of D if and only if is true at tω in any D-model. D is an intermediate logic between the provability logics GL and S. A Hilbert-style proof system for D is known, but there has been no sequent calculus. In this paper, we establish two sequent calculi for D, and show the cut-elimination theorem. We also introduce new Hilbert-style systems for D by interpreting the sequent calculi. Moreover, we show that D-models can be defined using an arbitrary limit ordinal as well as ω. Finally, we show a general result as follows. Let X and X+ be arbitrary modal logics. If the relationship between semantics of X and semantics of X+ is equal to that of GL and D, then X+ can be axiomatized based on X in the same way as the new axiomatization of D based on GL.
Turn this paper into a full lesson
ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.