Williams' path decomposition for self-similar Markov processes in Rd

Abstract

The classical result due tof Williams states that a Brownian motion with positive drift μ and issued from the origin is equal in law to a Brownian motion with unit negative drift, -μ, run until it hits a negative threshold, whose depth below the origin is independently and exponentially distributed with parameter 2μ, after which it behaves like a Brownian motion conditioned never to go below the aforesaid threshold (i.e. a Bessel-3 process, or equivalently a Brownian motion conditioned to stay positive, relative to the threshold). In this article we consider the analogue of Williams' path decomposition for a general self-similar Markov process (ssMp) on Rd. Roughly speaking, we will prove that law of a ssMp, say X, in Rd is equivalent in law to the concatenation of paths described as follows: suppose that we sample the point x* according to the law of the point of closest reach to the origin, sample; given x*, we build X having the law of X conditioned to hit x* continuously without entering the ball of radius |x*|; then, we construct X to have the law of X issued from x* conditioned never to enter the ball of radius |x*|; glueing the path of X end-to-end with X via the point x* produces a process which is equal in law to our original ssMp X. In essence, Williams' path decomposition in the setting of a ssMp follows directly from an analogous decomposition for Markov additive processes (MAPs). The latter class are intimately related to the former via a space-time transform known as the Lamperti--Kiu transform. As a key feature of our proof of Williams' path decomposition, will prove the analogue of Silverstein's duality identity for the excursion occupation measure for general Markov additive processes (MAPs).

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…