Borodin-Kostochka conjecture and Partitioning a graph into classes with no clique of specified size
Abstract
For a given graph H and the graphical properties P1, P2,…,Pk, a graph H is said to be (V1, V2,…,Vk)-partitionable if there exists a partition of V(H) into k-sets V1, V2…,Vk, such that for each i∈[k], the subgraph induced by Vi has the property Pi. In 1979, Bollob\'as and Manvel showed that for a graph H with maximum degree (H)≥ 3 and clique number ω(H)≤ (H), if (H)= p+q, then there exists a (V1,V2)-partition of V(H), such that (H[V1])≤ p, (H[V2])≤ q, H[V1] is (p-1)-degenerate, and H[V2] is (q-1)-degenerate. Assume that p1≥ p2≥·s≥ pk≥ 2 are k positive integers and Σi=1k pi=(H)-1+k. Assume that for each i∈[k] the properties Pi means that ω(H[Vi])≤ pi-1. Is H a (V1,…,Vk)-partitionable graph? In 1977, Borodin and Kostochka conjectured that any graph H with maximum degree (H)≥ 9 and without K(H) as a subgraph, has chromatic number at most (H)-1. Reed proved that the conjecture holds whenever (G) ≥ 1014 . When p1=2 and (H)≥ 9, the above question is the Borodin and Kostochka conjecture. Therefore, when all pis are equal to 2 and (H)≤ 8, the answer to the above question is negative. Let H is a graph with maximum degree , and clique number ω(H), where ω(H)≤ -1. In this article, we intend to study this question when k≥ 2 and ≥ 13. In particular as an analogue of the Borodin-Kostochka conjecture, for the case that ≥ 13 and pi≥ 2 we prove that the above question is true.
Turn this paper into a full lesson
ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.