Low Surface Brightness Galaxies selected by different model fitting

Abstract

We present a study of low surface brightness galaxies (LSBGs) selected by fitting the images for all the galaxies in α.40 SDSS DR7 sample with two kinds of single-component models and two kinds of two-component models (disk+bulge): single exponential, single s\'ersic, exponential+deVaucular (exp+deV), and exponential+s\'ersic (exp+ser). Under the criteria of the B band disk central surface brightness μ 0,disk (B) ≥slant 22.5\ mag\ arcsec-2 and the axis ratio b/a > 0.3, we selected four none-edge-on LSBG samples from each of the models which contain 1105, 1038, 207, and 75 galaxies, respectively. There are 756 galaxies in common between LSBGs selected by exponential and s\'ersic models, corresponding to 68.42% of LSBGs selected by the exponential model and 72.83% of LSBGs selected by the s\'ersic model, the rest of the discrepancy is due to the difference in obtaining μ0 between the exponential and s\'ersic models. Based on the fitting, in the range of 0.5 ≤slant n ≤slant 1.5, the relation of μ0 from two models can be written as μ 0,sersic - μ 0,exp = -1.34(n-1). The LSBGs selected by disk+bulge models (LSBG2comps) are more massive than LSBGs selected by single-component models (LSBG1comp), and also show a larger disk component. Though the bulges in the majority of our LSBG2comps are not prominent, more than 60% of our LSBG2comps will not be selected if we adopt a single-component model only. We also identified 31 giant low surface brightness galaxies (gLSBGs) from LSBG2comps. They are located at the same region in the color-magnitude diagram as other gLSBGs. After we compared different criteria of gLSBGs selection, we find that for gas-rich LSBGs, M > 1010M is the best to distinguish between gLSBGs and normal LSBGs with bulge.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…