k-Domination invariants on Kneser graphs

Abstract

In this follow-up to [M.G.~Cornet, P.~Torres, arXiv:2308.15603], where the k-tuple domination number and the 2-packing number in Kneser graphs K(n,r) were studied, we are concerned with two variations, the k-domination number, γk(K(n,r)), and the k-tuple total domination number, γt× k(K(n,r)), of K(n,r). For both invariants we prove monotonicity results by showing that γk(K(n,r)) γk(K(n+1,r)) holds for any n 2(k+r), and γt× k(K(n,r)) γt× k(K(n+1,r)) holds for any n 2r+1. We prove that γk(K(n,r))=γt× k(K(n,r))=k+r when n≥ r(k+r), and that in this case every γk-set and γt× k-set is a clique, while γk(r(k+r)-1,r)=γt× k(r(k+r)-1,r)=k+r+1, for any k 2. Concerning the 2-packing number, 2(K(n,r)), of K(n,r), we prove the exact values of 2(K(3r-3,r)) when r 10, and give sufficient conditions for 2(K(n,r)) to be equal to some small values by imposing bounds on r with respect to n. We also prove a version of monotonicity for the 2-packing number of Kneser graphs.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…