A Refinement of Hilbert's 1888 Theorem: Separating Cones along the Veronese Variety
Abstract
For n,d∈N, the cone Pn+1,2d of positive semi-definite (PSD) (n+1)-ary 2d-ic forms (i.e., homogeneous polynomials with real coefficients in n+1 variables of degree 2d) contains the cone n+1,2d of those that are representable as finite sums of squares (SOS) of (n+1)-ary d-ic forms. Hilbert's 1888 Theorem states that n+1,2d=Pn+1,2d exactly in the Hilbert cases (n+1,2d) with n+1=2 or 2d=2 or (3,4). For the non-Hilbert cases, we examine in [GHK] a specific cone filtration equation n+1,2d=C0⊂eq … ⊂eq Cn ⊂eq Cn+1 ⊂eq … ⊂eq Ck(n,d)-n=Pn+1,2dequation along k(n,d)+1-n projective varieties containing the Veronese variety via the Gram matrix method. Here, k(n,d)+1 is the dimension of the real vector space of (n+1)-ary d-ic forms. In particular, we compute the number μ(n,d) of strictly separating intermediate cones (i.e., Ci such that n+1,2d⊂neq Ci ⊂neq Pn+1,2d) for the cases (3,6) and (n+1,2d)n≥ 3,d=2,3. In this paper, firstly, we generalize our findings from [GHK] to any non-Hilbert case by identifying each strict inclusion in the above cone filtration. This allows us to give a refinement of Hilbert's 1888 Theorem by computing μ(n,d). The above cone filtration thus reduces to a specific cone subfiltration equation n+1,2d=C0⊂neq C1 ⊂neq … ⊂neq Cμ(n,d) ⊂neq Cμ(n,d)+1=Pn+1,2d equation in which each inclusion is strict. Secondly, we show that each Ci, and hence each strictly separating Ci, fails to be a spectrahedral shadow.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.