Efficient Frameworks for Generalized Low-Rank Matrix Bandit Problems

Abstract

In the stochastic contextual low-rank matrix bandit problem, the expected reward of an action is given by the inner product between the action's feature matrix and some fixed, but initially unknown d1 by d2 matrix * with rank r \d1, d2\, and an agent sequentially takes actions based on past experience to maximize the cumulative reward. In this paper, we study the generalized low-rank matrix bandit problem, which has been recently proposed in lu2021low under the Generalized Linear Model (GLM) framework. To overcome the computational infeasibility and theoretical restrain of existing algorithms on this problem, we first propose the G-ESTT framework that modifies the idea from jun2019bilinear by using Stein's method on the subspace estimation and then leverage the estimated subspaces via a regularization idea. Furthermore, we remarkably improve the efficiency of G-ESTT by using a novel exclusion idea on the estimated subspace instead, and propose the G-ESTS framework. We also show that G-ESTT can achieve the O((d1+d2)MrT) bound of regret while G-ESTS can achineve the O((d1+d2)3/2Mr3/2T) bound of regret under mild assumption up to logarithm terms, where M is some problem dependent value. Under a reasonable assumption that M = O((d1+d2)2) in our problem setting, the regret of G-ESTT is consistent with the current best regret of O((d1+d2)3/2 rT/Drr)~lu2021low (Drr will be defined later). For completeness, we conduct experiments to illustrate that our proposed algorithms, especially G-ESTS, are also computationally tractable and consistently outperform other state-of-the-art (generalized) linear matrix bandit methods based on a suite of simulations.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…