Empirical derivation of the metallicity evolution with time and radius using TNG50 Milky Way/Andromeda analogues

Abstract

Recent works have used a linear birth metallicity gradient to estimate the evolution of the [Fe/H] profile in the Galactic disk over time, and infer stellar birth radii (Rbirth) from [Fe/H] and age measurements. These estimates rely on the evolution of [Fe/H] at the Galactic center ([Fe/H](0, τ)) and the birth metallicity gradient (∇[Fe/H](τ)) over time -- quantities that are unknown and inferred under key assumptions. In this work, we use the sample of Milky Way/Andromeda analogues from the TNG50 simulation to investigate the ability to recover [Fe/H](R, τ) and Rbirth in a variety of galaxies. Using stellar disk particles, we test the assumptions required in estimating Rbirth, [Fe/H](0, τ), and ∇[Fe/H](τ) using recently proposed methods to understand when they are valid. We show that ∇[Fe/H](τ) can be recovered in most galaxies to within 26% from the range in [Fe/H] across age, with better accuracy for more massive and stronger barred galaxies. We also find that the true central metallicity is unrepresentative of the genuine disk [Fe/H] profile; thus we propose to use a projected central metallicity instead. About half of the galaxies in our sample do not have a continuously enriching projected central metallicity, with a dilution in [Fe/H] correlating with mergers. Most importantly, galaxy-specific [Fe/H](R, τ) can be constrained and confirmed by requiring the Rbirth distributions of mono-age, solar neighborhood populations to follow inside-out formation. We conclude that examining trends with Rbirth is valid for the Milky Way disk and similarly structured galaxies, where we expect Rbirth can be recovered to within 20% assuming today's measurement uncertainties in TNG50.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…