Low-rank matrices, tournaments, and symmetric designs
Abstract
Let a = (ai)i ≥ 1 be a sequence in a field F, and f F × F F be a function such that f(ai,ai) ≠ 0 for all i ≥ 1. For any tournament T over [n], consider the n × n symmetric matrix MT(f, a) with zero diagonal whose (i,j)th entry (for i < j) is f(ai,aj) if i j in T, and f(aj,ai) if j i in T. It is known (cf. Balachandran et al., Linear Algebra Appl. 658 (2023), 310-318) that if T is a uniformly random tournament over [n], then rank(MT(f,a)) ≥ (12-o(1))n with high probability when char(F) ≠ 2 and f is a linear function. In this paper, we investigate the other extremal question: how low can the ranks of such matrices be? We work with sequences a that take only two distinct values, so the rank of any such n × n matrix is at least n/2. First, we show that the rank of any such matrix depends on whether an associated bipartite graph has certain eigenvalues of high multiplicity. Using this, we show that if f is linear, then there are n × n real matrices MT(f;a) of rank at most n2 + O(1). For rational matrices, we show that for each > 0 we can find a sequence a() for which there are n × n matrices MT(f;a()) of rank at most (12 + )n + O(1). These matrices are constructed from symmetric designs, and we also use them to produce bisection-closed families of size greater than 3n/2 - 2 for n ≤ 15, which improves the previously best known bound (cf. Balachandran et al., Electron J. Combin. 26 (2019), #P2.40).
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.