AbacusPNG: A modest set of simulations of local-type primordial non-Gaussianity in the DESI era

Abstract

A measurement of a primordial non-Gaussianity (PNG) signal through late- or early-Universe probes has the potential to transform our understanding of the physics of the primordial Universe. N-body simulations, such as the public AbacusPNG set presented in this study, consisting of 9 boxes, each of size L box = 2~ Gpc/h and particle mass of 1.01 × 1010 \ M/h, provide a viable path forward. As validation, we find good agreement between the simulations and our expectations from one-loop perturbation theory and the `separate universe' method for the matter bispectrum, matter power spectrum and the halo bias parameter associated with PNG, bφ. As a science application, we investigate the link between halo assembly bias and bφ for halo properties known to play a vital role in accurately predicting galaxy clustering: concentration, shear (environment), and accretion rate. We find a strong response for all three parameters, suggesting that the connection between bφ and the assembly history of halos needs to be taken into account by future PNG analyses. We further perform the first study of the bφ parameter from fits to early DESI data of the luminous red galaxy (LRG) and quasi-stellar object (QSO) samples and comment on the effect on f NL constraints for the allowed galaxy-halo models (note that σ [f NL] σ [bφ]bφ). We find that the error on f NL is 21, 6, 22 for the LRGs at z = 0.5 and z = 0.8 and QSOs at z = 1.4, respectively, suggesting that a thorough understanding of galaxy assembly bias is warranted so as to perform robust high-precision analysis of local-type PNG with future surveys. Simulations publicly available at https://app.globus.org/file-manager?originid=ffc65d7a-0bf9-11ec-90b4-41052087bc27

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…