Deterministic Cache-Oblivious Funnelselect
Abstract
In the multiple-selection problem one is given an unsorted array S of N elements and an array of q query ranks r1<·s<rq, and the task is to return, in sorted order, the q elements in S of rank r1, …, rq, respectively. The asymptotic deterministic comparison complexity of the problem was settled by Dobkin and Munro [JACM 1981]. In the I/O model an optimal I/O complexity was achieved by Hu et al. [SPAA 2014]. Recently [ESA 2023], we presented a cache-oblivious algorithm with matching I/O complexity, named funnelselect, since it heavily borrows ideas from the cache-oblivious sorting algorithm funnelsort from the seminal paper by Frigo, Leiserson, Prokop and Ramachandran [FOCS 1999]. Funnelselect is inherently randomized as it relies on sampling for cheaply finding many good pivots. In this paper we present deterministic funnelselect, achieving the same optional I/O complexity cache-obliviously without randomization. Our new algorithm essentially replaces a single (in expectation) reversed-funnel computation using random pivots by a recursive algorithm using multiple reversed-funnel computations. To meet the I/O bound, this requires a carefully chosen subproblem size based on the entropy of the sequence of query ranks; deterministic funnelselect thus raises distinct technical challenges not met by randomized funnelselect. The resulting worst-case I/O bound is O(Σi=1q+1 iB · M/B Ni + NB), where B is the external memory block size, M≥ B1+ε is the internal memory size, for some constant ε>0, and i = ri - ri-1 (assuming r0=0 and rq+1=N + 1).
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.