A necessary and sufficient condition for bounds on the sum of a list of real numbers and its applications
Abstract
Let x1,...,xn be a list of real numbers, let s :=Σi=1nxi and let h:N → R be a function. We gave a necessary and sufficient condition for s>h(n) (respectively, s<h(n)). Let G=(V,E) be a graph, let \H1,...,Hn\ and \V1,...,Vn\ be a decomposition and a partition of G, respectively. Let Hi,j and Vi,j, i≤ j, be the union of Hi,...,Hj and Vi,...,Vj, respectively, where subscripts are taken modulo n. G is generalized periodic or partition-transitive if for each pair of integers (i,j), Hi,i+k and Hj,j+k or Vi,i+k and Vj,j+k are isomorphic for all k, 1≤ k≤ n, respectively. Let f:E → R and g:V → R be mappings, let the weight of f or g on G be e∈ Ef(e) or v∈ Vg(v), respectively. Suppose that parameters λ and of G can be expressed as the minimum or maximum weight of specified f and g, respectively. Then our conditions imply a necessary and sufficient condition for λ(G1)=h(n) (respectively, (G2)=h(n)), where G1 is generalized periodic and G2 is partition-transitive. For example, the crossing number cr((Tn)) of a periodic graph (Tn), cr((Tn))=h(n). As applications, we obtained cr(C(4n;\1,4\)) of the circulant C(4n;\1,4\), the paired domination number of C5 Cn and the upper total domination number of C4 Cn.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.