On Approximate Fully-Dynamic Matching and Online Matrix-Vector Multiplication

Abstract

We study connections between the problem of fully dynamic (1-ε)-approximate maximum bipartite matching, and the dual (1+ε)-approximate vertex cover problem, with the online matrix-vector (OMv) conjecture which has recently been used in several fine-grained hardness reductions. We prove that there is an online algorithm that maintains a (1+ε)-approximate vertex cover in amortized n1-cε-C time for constants c, C > 0 for fully dynamic updates if and only if the OMv conjecture is false. Similarly, we prove that there is an online algorithm that maintains a (1-ε)-approximate maximum matching in amortized n1-cε-C time if and only if there is a nontrivial algorithm for another dynamic problem, which we call dynamic approximate OMv, that has seemingly no matching structure. This provides some evidence against achieving amortized sublinear update times for approximate fully dynamic matching and vertex cover. Leveraging these connections, we obtain faster algorithms for approximate fully dynamic matching in both the online and offline settings. 1. We give a randomized algorithm that with high probability maintains a (1-ε)-approximate bipartite matching and (1+ε)-approximate vertex cover in fully dynamic graphs, in amortized O(ε-O(1) n2( n)) update time. Our algorithm leverages fast algorithms for OMv due to Larsen-Williams [SODA 2017]. 2. We give a randomized offline algorithm for (1-ε)-approximate maximum matching with amortized runtime O(n.58ε-O(1)) by using fast matrix multiplication, significantly improving over the runtimes achieved via online algorithms. We also give an offline algorithm that maintains a (1+ε)-approximate vertex cover in amortized O(n.723ε-O(1)) time.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…