A simple prediction of the nonlinear matter power spectrum in Brans-Dicke gravity from linear theory

Abstract

Brans-Dicke (BD), one of the first proposed scalar-tensor theories of gravity, effectively makes the gravitational constant of general relativity (GR) time-dependent. Constraints on the BD parameter ω serve as a benchmark for testing GR, which is recovered in the limit ω → ∞. Current small-scale astrophysical constraints ω 105 are much tighter than large-scale cosmological constraints ω 103, but the two decouple if the true theory of gravity features screening. On the largest cosmological scales, BD approximates the most general second-order scalar-tensor (Horndeski) theory, so constraints here have wider implications. These constraints will improve with upcoming large-scale structure and cosmic microwave background surveys. To constrain BD with weak gravitational lensing, one needs its nonlinear matter power spectrum PBD. By comparing the boost B = PBD/PGR from linear theory and nonlinear N-body simulations, we show that the nonlinear boost can simply be predicted from linear theory if the BD and GR universes are parameterized in a way that makes their early cosmological evolution and quasilinear power today similar. In particular, they need the same H0 / [b]G eff(a=0) and σ8, where G eff is the (effective) gravitational strength. Our prediction is 1\% accurate for ω ≥ 100, z ≤ 3, and k ≤ 1\,h/Mpc; and 2\% up to k ≤ 5\,h/Mpc. It also holds for GBD that do not match Newton's constant today, so one can study GR with different gravitational constants GGR by sending ω → ∞. We provide a code that computes B with the linear Einstein-Boltzmann solver hiclass and multiplies it by the nonlinear PGR from EuclidEmulator2 to predict PBD.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…