Recognizing Relating Edges in Graphs without Cycles of Length 6
Abstract
A graph G is well-covered if all maximal independent sets are of the same cardinality. Let w:V(G) be a weight function. Then G is w-well-covered if all maximal independent sets are of the same weight. An edge xy ∈ E(G) is relating if there exists an independent set S such that both S \x\ and S \y\ are maximal independent sets in the graph. If xy is relating then w(x)=w(y) for every weight function w such that G is w-well-covered. Relating edges play an important role in investigating w-well-covered graphs. The decision problem whether an edge in a graph is relating is NP-complete. We prove that the problem remains NP-complete when the input is restricted to graphs without cycles of length 6. This is an unexpected result because recognizing relating edges is known to be polynomially solvable for graphs without cycles of lengths 4 and 6, graphs without cycles of lengths 5 and 6, and graphs without cycles of lengths 6 and 7. A graph G belongs to the class W2 if every two pairwise disjoint independent sets in G are included in two pairwise disjoint maximum independent sets. It is known that if G belongs to the class W2, then it is well-covered. A vertex v ∈ V(G) is shedding if for every independent set S ⊂eq V(G)-N[v], there exists a vertex u ∈ N(v) such that S \u\ is independent. Shedding vertices play an important role in studying the class W2. Recognizing shedding vertices is co-NP-complete, even when the input is restricted to triangle-free graphs. We prove that the problem is co-NP-complete for graphs without cycles of length 6.
Turn this paper into a full lesson
ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.