Exponential Lower Bounds for Smooth 3-LCCs and Sharp Bounds for Designs

Abstract

We give improved lower bounds for binary 3-query locally correctable codes (3-LCCs) C \0,1\k → \0,1\n. Specifically, we prove: (1) If C is a linear design 3-LCC, then n ≥ 2(1 - o(1))k . A design 3-LCC has the additional property that the correcting sets for every codeword bit form a perfect matching and every pair of codeword bits is queried an equal number of times across all matchings. Our bound is tight up to a factor 8 in the exponent of 2, as the best construction of binary 3-LCCs (obtained by taking Reed-Muller codes on F4 and applying a natural projection map) is a design 3-LCC with n ≤ 28 k. Up to a 8 factor, this resolves the Hamada conjecture on the maximum F2-codimension of a 4-design. (2) If C is a smooth, non-linear, adaptive 3-LCC with perfect completeness, then, n ≥ 2(k1/5). (3) If C is a smooth, non-linear, adaptive 3-LCC with completeness 1 - , then n ≥ (k12). In particular, when is a small constant, this implies a lower bound for general non-linear LCCs that beats the prior best n ≥ (k3) lower bound of [AGKM23] by a polynomial factor. Our design LCC lower bound is obtained via a fine-grained analysis of the Kikuchi matrix method applied to a variant of the matrix used in [KM23]. Our lower bounds for non-linear codes are obtained by designing a from-scratch reduction from nonlinear 3-LCCs to a system of "chain XOR equations": polynomial equations with similar structure to the long chain derivations that arise in the lower bounds for linear 3-LCCs [KM23].

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…