Good bounds for sets lacking skew corners

Abstract

A skew corner is a triple of points in Z × Z of the form (x,y), (x, y + a) and (x + a, y'). Pratt posed the following question: how large can a set A ⊂eq [n] × [n] be, provided it contains no non-trivial skew corner (i.e. one for which a=0)? We prove that |A| ≤ (- cc n) n2, for an absolute constant c > 0, which, along with a construction of Beker, essentially resolves Pratt's question. Our argument is represents a two-dimensional variant of the method of Kelley and Meka, which they used to prove Behrend-type bounds in Roth's theorem. A very similar result was obtained independently and simultaneously by Jaber, Lovett and Ostuni.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…